Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Trading View (next 2-4 weeks): We like to be slightly bearish bitcoin.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Summary

Trading View (next 2-4 weeks): We like to be slightly bearish bitcoin.

Investment view (next 1-3 years): We like to be long bitcoin.

Macro

  • March US CPI showed no incremental progress on disinflation (a smaller decline in used car prices offset a slower rise in housing costs).
  • Higher-than-expected PMI data indicates that business activity in the US accelerated in April.
  • We agree with the markets pricing in an 85% chance of a 25bp hike at the May 3rd FOMC meeting.
  • We believe the probability of a full-blown banking crisis is low.
  • The probability of a recession in the next 12 months remains high.
  • Overall, the macro backdrop remains bearish.

On-Chain/Flow signals

  • Our signals on the chain are split this week with two bullish, two bearish and two neutral.
  • The signal on the chain is overall neutral.

Overall View

  • With the macro backdrop bearish, and our on-chain/flow signals neutral, our overall view is slightly bearish on bitcoin (Figure 1).

Macro: Data points to higher for longer interest rates

Inflationary trends remain stubborn. March’s CPI showed no incremental progress on disinflation as a smaller decline in used car prices offset a slower rise in housing costs. Furthermore, with unemployment at a 50-year low and strong demand growth, core inflation remains unresponsive to lower energy prices. This suggests that a sharp increase in energy prices could lead to a general increase in inflation, especially given the recent cuts in oil production announced by OPEC+.

Consumption growth may remain above the trend. We believe consumption may remain strong as income and spending dynamics are likely to keep inflation within the current range. A risk to this view is a credit crunch that puts pressure on spending, although we consider this unlikely.

Business activity is increasing in the United States. A higher-than-expected reading for the S&P Global Flash Composite PMI (53.5 vs 52.8 expected) suggests that business activity has picked up again and raises the possibility that the Fed’s rate hike cycle will continue beyond May 3.

We agree with markets pricing in an 85% chance of a 25bp increase at the May 3 FOMC meeting, but disagrees with the c. 40 bps of cuts priced in over the rest of the year.

Overall, the data continues to point to higher for longer interest rates. The macro background is bearish for bitcoin.

On-Chain/Flow: ETF outflows resume

Two give a positive signal this week:

  • Future’s activity: The perpetual financing rates are still positive.
  • HODLer behavior: The majority (67%) of the coin supply has not moved for at least a year.

Two calculations give a bearish signal:

  • Institutional demand: ETF outflows resume.
  • Liquidity needs: A bias exists for currency inflows.
See also  Coin Center says the RESTRICT Act could be used to ban Bitcoin

The remaining two calculations give a neutral signal:

  • P&L for investors: The profitability of the coin supply has fallen recently, but realized profits still dominate the chain.
  • Mining activity: Hash rate sets new all-time highs, but miner earnings are down.

All in all, on-chain/flow metrics give a neutral signal. Here are the details of each calculation (with explanations in the appendix).

Institutional demand: Bearish Bitcoin

Our preferred metric for tracking institutional demand is flows into bitcoin ETFs. Outflows, although small in scale, have returned. About $11 million left the Bitcoin ETFs we track over the past 5 days (Chart 2). This is bearish bitcoin.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Demand for liquidity and exchange activity: Bearish Bitcoin

On exchange flows:

  • In the short term, there is a bias towards inflows into stock exchanges. A net c. 24,000 coins were exchanged in the last two weeks (Figure 3).
  • In the longer term, the 30-day change in the foreign exchange balance has entered positive territory again (Figure 4).

Overall, the currency inflow bias is bearish for bitcoin as it suggests that investors want to keep their coins in a liquid capacity where they are easier to sell.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?
Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Futures Activity: Bullish Bitcoin

In futures markets:

  • Open futures ($8.3bn), a good measure of investor interest, has declined since the peak of $9.8bn on April 13, although it is up 3% MoM (Chart 5).
  • Perpetual funding rates have on average remained positive (Figure 6). This means traders are paying a premium to hold open long positions, which is bullish for bitcoin. However, the extent of the positive financing rate has been decreasing recently.

Together, this is bullish bitcoin.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

HODLers: Bullish Bitcoin

On HODLer calculations:

  • The 30-day moving average for coin days destroyed (CDD) is down -17% MoM (Figure 7).
  • The 30-day moving average of the 1y+ revived supply estimate is down -18% MoM (Figure 8).
  • The 1-year+ vintage dominates around 67% of the coin supply now (Figure 9).

Overall, we still see the strong conviction of most of the coin supply as a bullish signal for bitcoin.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Investor profits and losses: Neutral Bitcoin

On the profitability of the coin supply:

  • The percentage of circulating offers in profit (PSIP) stands at 70%, down -4pp MoM (figure 10).
  • Net unrealized profit (NUPL) is 0.29 (29% of market value, flat MoM, figure 11). The calculation means that the offer is in a net profit position (NUPL > 0), with a market value that exceeds the realized ceiling.
  • So far this year, the operating profit rate (SOPR) has spent 64% of the time above one (realized profit, Figure 12). Looking at the last month alone, the SOPR has been above one 83% of the time.

The profitability of the coin supply has taken a hit recently, but the supply remains in an (unrealized) net profit position (NUPL > 0) and on-chain realized profits (SOPR > 1) dominate so far this year. Overall, this is neutral for bitcoin.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?
Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

Mining activity: Neutral Bitcoin

Hash rate continues to set new records and is up +2% MoM (Figure 13). Meanwhile, earnings from miners are down -4% month-on-month (Figure 14). Altogether, this is neutral bitcoin.

Will Inflation Concerns Doom the Bitcoin Rally?

appendix

Institutional demand

Perhaps the largest institutional vehicle for bitcoin is the Grayscale Trust, with over $27 billion in assets. It invests exclusively in BTC, and so many investors, especially institutional ones, who cannot hold BTC directly, can gain exposure through investing in grayscale. Accordingly, if the trust trades at a premium to BTC prices, it may involve “excess” demand from institutions, but “excess” supply if it trades at a discount. Alternatively, the discount may indicate that investors have found other ways to gain exposure to BTC, either through ETFs or directly holding BTC. We therefore focus on how the discount has changed in recent months to gauge investor interest. Alternatively, investors can use other vehicles to gain exposure such as ETFs or hold BTC directly. We place more emphasis on BTC flows than the Grayscale premium.

See also  Bitcoin Struggles After Inflation Report; California Crypto Bill is an Overreach, Legal Experts Say

Liquidity needs

Another measure of cryptocurrency bullishness is whether investors are willing to hold it in illiquid form (eg a private wallet) or prefer a liquid form (eg on an exchange). The former suggests that investors are bullish, as they are comfortable not being able to sell easily. Conversely, keeping it in liquid form would indicate that investors are bearish, as they prefer to be able to sell easily.

Therefore, large flows to crypto exchanges would suggest that investors want to convert their holdings into a more liquid form, which implies more bearishness.

Futures activity

We track the growing bitcoin futures market. Open interest – the sum of long and short contracts – is a good measure of investor interest.

Perpetual funding rates reveal the directional bias of investors. Exchanges set funding rates to prevent a lasting divergence in the price of the futures contract and the underlying since perpetual contracts have no expiration date, so never settle in the traditional sense. Accordingly, we can interpret funding rates as the cost of holding bitcoin via perpetual futures. Positive funding rates mean longs pay shorts and vice versa. We use it as a proxy for trader sentiment since a positive funding rate suggests that traders are paying a premium to hold open long positions.

HODLers

In our initial bitcoin flow framework, we explained “HODLers” and “HODLing”. HODLing refers to buy-and-hold strategies in the context of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Those who HODL for longer periods are die-hard followers.

We can categorize HODLers by how long they have held BTC. We define long-term or faithful HODLers as those who bought BTC five or more years ago and have held it since, medium-term HODLers as those who bought 6-12 months ago, and short-term HODLers as those who bought 3-6 months ago.

Coin days destroyed (CDD) is defined as the number of coins in a transaction multiplied by the number of days since the coins were last used. So increasing CDD suggests that older coins are being used (more coin days are being destroyed) and vice versa.

Profit and loss

The percentage contribution in profit (PSIP). This tracks the proportion of circulating BTC supply in profits. It is the percentage of circulating BTC whose current price is higher than when it was last transacted (movement).

See also  FTX Warns Community of Fake 'Debt Tokens' and Scams Claiming to Be Affiliated with Bankrupt Exchange - Bitcoin News

Net unrealized profit (NUPL). This is the ratio between unrealized profit and total market value. While PSIP only focuses on whether BTC coins are in profit or not, NUPL focuses on the size of profit. So we can have a situation where the PSIP is low – that is, a low proportion of the supply is in profit – but the NUPL can be high if the size of those profits is large.

Used Production Profit Percentage (SOPR). While PSIP and NUPL focus on unrealized profit or mark-to-market, this measure focuses on realized profit. SOPR is the realized value of a transaction divided by the value at initiation (or creation) – more simply, sold price divided by paid price. If the SOPR is above one, the investors have collectively realized profits, while below one means they have realized losses. In broad uptrends, SOPR spends a significant amount of time above one, while the opposite is true for broad downtrends.

As the SOPR rises, sellers increasingly realize profits. The opposite is true when it falls. A price rise with a flatter SOPR trend indicates that investors are yet to realize the gains from the rise. Investors’ reluctance to sell and realize a profit may be because they believe the price will rise further, which would be bullish. At the same time, more profit taking could precede a correction. Generally, it has proven to be a profitable strategy to buy while the SOPR is moving around one during bullish periods.

Mining

Data power is central to the crypto market. Miners use advanced computer hardware to solve complex problems that verify BTC transactions (and other coins) on the public ledger or blockchain. The miners are rewarded with new coins for their efforts. A measure of the complexity of the problems and therefore the computing performance required to solve them is the hash rate. The higher this speed, the more computing power is required to maintain the blockchain. The exchange rate may vary depending on the demand for crypto.

Dalvir Mandara is a quantitative researcher at Macro Hive. Dalvir has a BSc Mathematics and Computer Science and an MSc Mathematical Finance both from the University of Birmingham. His areas of interest are the use of machine learning, deep learning and alternative data for predictive modeling of financial markets.
Bilal Hafeez is the Managing Director and Editor of Macro Hive. He spent over twenty years doing research at major banks – JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank and Nomura, where he held various ‘Global Head’ roles doing currency, rate and market research.
Image credit: depositphotos.com
(The commentary in the article above does not constitute an offer or a solicitation, or a recommendation to implement or liquidate an investment or to carry out any other transaction. It should not be used as a basis for any investment decision or other decision. Any investment decision should be based on appropriate professional advice specific to your needs.)

Enter your email address to read this Macro Hive Exclusive

OR

START 30-DAY FREE TRIAL

Already have a Macro Hive Prime account? Sign in

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *