Stablecoin Issuer Tether Won’t Freeze Tornado Cash Addresses, Says Premature Freezing Could Jeopardize Investigations – Bitcoin News

Stablecoin Issuer Tether Won’t Freeze Tornado Cash Addresses, Says Premature Freezing Could Jeopardize Investigations – Bitcoin News

While the crypto community is still talking about the US government banning ethereum mixing platform Tornado Cash, stablecoin issuer Tether Holdings Limited revealed on Wednesday that the company would not be “freezing Tornado Cash addresses.” Tether’s recently published blog post on the subject says the company is awaiting instructions from law enforcement.

Tether has no plans to freeze Tornado Cash-linked private wallets pending hearing from law enforcement

On August 8, the U.S. Treasury Department’s financial watchdog, the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), banned ethereum mingling application Tornado Cash, and since then, OFAC’s sanctions enforcement has been met with controversy. Of course, OFAC’s actions caused a ripple effect, and a number of companies such as Circle Financials and Coinbase’s Center consortium, Github and Discord took action. For example, were developers suspended from Github, the Tornado Cash Discord server was deleted, and reports noted that Center blacklisted dozens of ethereum addresses and froze 75,000 USDC.

According to a blog post published by Tether Holdings Limited published 16 days after OFAC’s ban, the company explains that as of now it is not freezing USDT assets held in the Tornado Cash mixer. Tether says the company works regularly with law enforcement and is in daily contact with “key officers.” If a law enforcement official makes a legitimate request to freeze a private wallet, Tether will “comply with the freeze”, but we do not freeze wallets for exchanges/services,” the company added.

See also  Bitcoin mining software overhaul Stratum v2 promoted by Block, Braiins

Tether’s blog post continues:

So far, OFAC has not indicated that a stablecoin issuer is expected to freeze secondary market addresses that are published on OFAC’s SDN list or that are operated by individuals and entities that have been sanctioned by OFAC. Furthermore, no US law enforcement agency or regulator has made such a request despite our almost daily contact with US law enforcement, whose requests always provide accurate details.

Unilaterally freezing addresses too soon can be a bad move, says Tether

Furthermore, Tether says that choosing to unilaterally freeze secondary market addresses “could very well be a very disruptive and reckless move.” The company also described that there have been cases where law enforcement has asked the company not to freeze suspect private wallets so that suspects of an investigation are not notified and liquidate the funds. Tether’s blog post also calls out a number of stablecoin issuers such as Paxos, a New York-based regulated company.

Tether said Paxos did not freeze Tornado Cash wallets and USDT’s issuer further noted that Makerdao, the issuer of the decentralized finance (defi) stablecoin DAI did not proceed with any kind of freeze. However, Tether appears to disagree with the move made by USDC’s issuers. “We believe that, if done without instructions from US authorities, the USDC’s move to blacklist Tornado Cash smart contracts was premature and may have jeopardized the work of other regulators and law enforcement agencies,” the blog post added on Wednesday.

Tags in this story

Circle, DAI, Discord, ETH mixer, Ethereum Mixer, github, Law Enforcement, makerdao, Mixer, OFAC, OFAC’s SDN List, Paxos, Premature Freeze, Regulations, Sanctions, Stablecoin issuer, stablecoin issuers, Stablecoins, Tether, Tether Holdings, Tornado cash, US government, USDC, USDC issuer, USDT

What do you think of Tether’s blog post saying it will not freeze USDT linked to Tornado Cash and that it is awaiting instructions from law enforcement? What do you think of the company’s comment about USDC’s issuer blacklisting stablecoin wallets? Let us know what you think about this topic in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the news editor at Bitcoin.com News and a financial technology journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or an endorsement or recommendation of products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is directly or indirectly responsible for damages or losses caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *