Ron DeSantis wants to ban CBDCs. Is it even possible?

Ron DeSantis wants to ban CBDCs.  Is it even possible?

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaks during a book tour in Des Moines, Iowa. Rachel Mummey—The Washington Post/Getty Images

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Monday announced legislation banning the use of central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, in his state.

“The Biden administration’s effort to inject a centralized bank digital currency is about surveillance and control,” he said in a statement, arguing that it “will stifle innovation and promote state-sanctioned surveillance.”

Neither Congress nor the president has ordered the creation of a digital dollar, and there is little precedent for a state’s rejection of a hypothetical form of legal tender.

Why did DeSantis, who may compete against Donald Trump in the race to become the next Republican presidential nominee, wade into the controversial fray of central government-backed digital currencies? And if the Federal Reserve were to mint digital dollars, would his proposed legislation have any teeth?

Constitutionally illegitimate

The Florida governor’s proposed legislation is most likely constitutionally illegitimate, according to four CBDC experts.

Richard Epstein, a law professor at New York University who has written about the implications of government use of digital currencies, cites the legal doctrine of “preemption,” or the idea that federal law supersedes state or local law when they conflict. Fortune that Florida cannot simply opt out of a federal mandate.

See also  EU Lawmakers Pass Landmark Crypto Regulation Bill

“Monetary policy in the United States requires a single currency,” he said in an interview. “Constitutional law was enacted pursuant to the supreme law of the land, notwithstanding any state law to the contrary.”

Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University who wrote The future of money, which covers the rise of cryptocurrencies and CBDCs, was less firm in its belief of the bill’s illegality. He said there are gray areas, including the state’s legal discretion to control payment systems. However, he remained skeptical.

“It seems a little ridiculous for a state government to take precedence over the Federal Reserve in determining the form of the national currency,” he said Fortune.

Are DeSantis’ concerns valid?

The Florida governor’s concerns about CBDCs are not entirely misplaced, according to Jiaying Jiang, an assistant law professor at the University of Florida who researches cryptocurrency regulation.

“There are a lot of privacy concerns,” she said Fortune. Just as with Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with public ledgers, a database of digital dollars, where the government could potentially monitor a citizen’s transactions, could lead to privacy violations.

However, she added, DeSantis’ claim that the CBDC will threaten community banks and smaller financial institutions is misinformed. Most countries exploring the implementation of a state-backed digital currency will likely issue it to banks, which will then distribute the tokens to the public.

“Financial intermediaries, they deal with customers every single day,” Jiang said Fortune. “They have the infrastructure. They have the technology.”

See also  Founder of 'My Big Coin' sentenced for crypto fraud

Why ban something that doesn’t exist?

While the White House is rumored to be pushing to create a digital dollar and recently released a framework to guide the “responsible development of digital assets,” the executive branch does not have the authority to unilaterally declare a new legal tender.

“When we think about digital money, that authority rests with Congress,” said Jonathan Dharmapalan, founder and CEO of eCurrency, which builds technology for central banks to issue digital currency. Fortune.

Moreover, Prasad, the Cornell professor, said DeSantis’ proclamations about the current administration’s support for CBDCs are exaggerated.

“I don’t think the Biden administration has taken a strong position on this other than to say this is an issue that the Fed should look into,” he said Fortune“because the reality is that digital payments are becoming the norm.”

“This,” concluded Prasad, “is largely a political gesture with limited substantive meaning.”

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *