Crypto.com mistakenly sends woman $7.2 million instead of $68 refund

Crypto.com mistakenly sends woman .2 million instead of  refund

Comment

What would you do if you checked your bank account and found millions that shouldn’t be there?

For one woman in Australia — who faced that scenario last year after cryptocurrency platform Crypto.com mistakenly transferred 10.5 million Australian dollars ($7.2 million) into her bank account — the answer was: Buy a mansion.

Now a judge in southeastern Australia has ordered the sale of the property – which the woman apparently bought as a gift for her sister living overseas – and awarded all proceeds from the sale to the crypto company.

The cautionary tale has attracted international attention, especially since it emerged that it took Crypto.com seven months to discover the flaw.

Katie Gregory, a spokeswoman for Crypto.com, wrote in response to a request for comment from The Post, “As the matter is before the courts, we cannot comment.”

Woman Checked Her Junk Mail and Found She Won $3 Million in the Lottery — But You Should Still Be Wary of Scams

Crypto.com is best known outside the cryptocurrency world as the company whose name now adorns the former Staples Center in Los Angeles – and for Super Bowl commercials featuring actor Matt Damon and basketball star LeBron James referring to cryptocurrency investors as pioneers, under the slogan ” Fortune favors the brave.”

It laid off 5 percent of the company’s workforce in June amid a widespread decline in the cryptocurrency market.

Analysis: Celebrities have gone crypto

The Supreme Court of Victoria heard that in May 2021 Crypto.com, operating under a different company name in Australia, mistakenly transferred about $7.2 million to Thevamanogari Manivel instead of the repayment of about $68. The error occurred when an employee accidentally filled in the payment amount field with an account number, the court said.

See also  SDNY accepts the argument that crypto is subject to the Electronic Funds Transfer Act/Regulation E | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

“Extraordinarily, the plaintiffs allegedly did not realize this significant error until some 7 months later, at the end of December 2021,” during an audit, the court said in its ruling. In February, after looking into what was happening, the company sought to place an order freezing Manivel’s accounts to recover the full amount, according to the background of the case released by the court.

However, Crypto.com submitted evidence showing Manivel had already transferred most of the money to an account held with another defendant, who may have been in a “romantic relationship” with Manivel, according to evidence heard by the court. Manivel also sent almost $300,000 to her daughter, and in February she bought a property in Craigieburn worth A$1.35 million ($925,000) for her sister, Thilagavathy Gangadory, who lives in Malaysia.

The four-bedroom, four-bathroom mansion about 20 miles north of Melbourne sits on more than 5,800 square meters of land and has a private cinema, a gym and parking for two cars, according to Australian website realestate.com.au.

Lawyers for Manivel and Gangadory were not listed on the judgment document.

A Mega Millions host crunched the winning number. Some still got paid.

Crypto.com’s Australian companies have been engaged in legal proceedings against Manivel, Gangadory and six other defendants since. In May, Judge James Dudley Elliott entered a default judgment in the case against Gangadory – meaning she did not file a notice of appearance by the deadline set by the court. Elliott thus ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Foris GFS Australia Pty Ltd., which helps operate Crypto.com’s trading platform in Australia.

See also  Omaha senior loses $6,000 in Bitcoin scam

The company’s lawyers were apparently unable to reach Gangadory, the court said, although she appeared to be aware the case was ongoing, because her sister’s lawyers said in March that Gangadory was seeking legal advice.

Under the judge’s ruling, published last week, Foris GFS was awarded all proceeds and interest from the sale of the Craigieburn property. Gangadory was ordered to pay the company’s legal costs related to the case, as well as 10 percent interest, which amounts to nearly $19,000, the court said.

Gangadory can appeal, but she must provide “a good reason for not submitting documents, a valid defense to the case, and give reasons why the court should not have made the order” against her, according to the Victoria County court. The next court date is set for October 7, when the judge will outline the next steps in the case in what is known as a “guidance hearing.”

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *