A string of 200 ‘sleeping bitcoins’ from 2010 worth 4.27 million dollars moved on Friday – Bitcoin news

A string of 200 ‘sleeping bitcoins’ from 2010 worth 4.27 million dollars moved on Friday – Bitcoin news

While the price of bitcoin stays above $ 21,000 per unit range, four bitcoin block rewards won in 2010 were used for the first time in over 11 years. The four block rewards were won between September and October 2010, and the 200 bitcoins worth $ 4.27 million were transferred to an unknown wallet.

4 consecutive block rewards used June 24, data suggest that expenses were incurred by a single entity

A large number of so-called ‘sleeping bitcoins’ have woken up from hibernation when four block rewards were used at block height 742,183. The old coins used on Friday were block rewards mined on 15, 16, 26 September and 29 October 2010. During this time frame, bitcoin miners received 50 BTC for each block found, as opposed to 6.25 BTC per block reward miners receive today.

The block rewards that were moved came from four addresses that include “18cxWU”, “1BJmWW”, “1FVVcE” and “1Hdo8D.” The expenses in 2010 were captured by the blockchain parser btcparser.com, and at all four addresses the owner did not use the associated bitcoin cash (BCH) and bitcoinsv (BSV) since these coins are still inactive.

Blockchain researchers show that the 200 virgin bitcoins were sent to a single address (bc1q92) and the coins remain inactive at the time of writing. A subsequent number of 2010 block rewards used in the same block suggests that a single unit was probably the owner of the block rewards. Bitcoins that were mined in 2010 over a period of two months (September and October) also suggest that the expenses were incurred by a single entity.

See also  European Countries Need Bitcoiners - Bitcoin Magazine

Transfers had low privacy ratings, “Sleeping Bitcoin” string spending from 2010 has decreased

It seems that the addresses were swept, and the transactions have a very low privacy rating for various reasons. Blockchair.com’s privacy-o-meter indicates that the final consolidation of bc1q92 had a privacy score of 0 out of 100. The transactions contained vulnerabilities such as matched addresses, co-spending, and the same address is used in multiple inputs.

There have not been many series of 2010 block rewards since the 2010 mega-whale appeared months ago back in March. The mega whale in 2010 typically used strings of 20 block rewards from that year at a time. Before the series of four block subsidies from 2010 used, a week ago the address “1Li8RF” used 50 virgin bitcoins, and “1LNqDK” used 50 BTC from 2010 about a month ago.

Tags in this story

200 Bitcoin, 200 BTC, 2010 whale, 4 block rewards, bitcoin whale, Block reward, block reward use, Blockchain Explorers, Blockchair, BTC, BTC Whale, Btcparser.com, decades old bitcoins, older addresses, massive whale, redistribution transfer, sleeping bitcoins, string on four

What do you think about the 200 so-called ‘sleeping bitcoins’ from 2010 used on 24 June? Tell us what you think about this topic in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is a news editor at Bitcoin.com News and a financial engineering journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols that are emerging today.




Photo credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or recommendation of products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the Company nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to have been caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on the content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *